Blog Entry

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Posted on: September 13, 2011 9:59 am
Edited on: September 13, 2011 10:13 am
  •  
 


By Matt Snyder


One big storyline that emerged in baseball Sunday night was the Mets not being allowed to wear first responder (NYPD, FDNY, etc.) hats during the national telecast on ESPN. They did wear them in pre-game festivities -- as seen above on Ronny Paulino -- but not during the actual game, per MLB rule.

It turns out, according to a report from the New York Post Tuesday, there may be more than initially met the eye. Reportedly, commissioner Bud Selig called the Mets Sunday night and was "irate" that the team threw Major League Baseball under the proverbial bus.

"[Selig] got embarrassed by it," a Mets official said (New York Post). "The game got moved into prime time because of 9/11, and [MLB] ended up getting embarrassed."

The report also notes that Joe Torre -- who was named as the person who ordered the Mets to not wear the hats -- said there was a league-wide memo sent out but nothing specifically about the Mets, nor was the message anything "heavy-handed."

And then there's this (New York Post):
But another source said Mets COO Jeff Wilpon was "back and forth" with the commissioner's office on the matter until the proverbial 11th hour, when it was decided the Mets, on the hook for a $25 million loan from MLB, shouldn't risk the wrath of Selig.
So, if all this is true, the Mets basically forced their players to comply and let the commissioner's office take the blame in nefarious manner -- even though they didn't want to risk the wrath of Selig?

It's hard to know who to trust here. It seems like there's blame to be placed in both camps, but the bottom line is the players should have just been allowed to wear the special hats. It's a hat. Don't give me slippery slope on this. It's the 10-year anniversary of 9/11 in New York City. That's a special circumstance. Whether it's Wilpon, Selig, Torre or any combination of the three, someone dropped the ball.

"Moneyball" venom: There's a story in the LA Times about the "Moneyball" movie coming out and how polarizing it is. One telling quote is how, after winning the World Series last season, Giants executive Tony Siegle said "so much for Moneyball" in celebration. Later in the article, Siegle cops to having never read the book. And here's the crux of my criticism with those criticizing "Moneyball." The book wasn't saying A's general manager Billy Beane invented sabermetrics (he didn't) or that he was reinventing the wheel (he wasn't). It was just a story about a GM trying to find a creative way to compete with a less than competitive payroll. And he did for several years. It doesn't claim he invented on-base percentage or that he's a genius. It's a story. A good one. Maybe read the book before you complain about it. Nothing drives me more crazy than hearing something like "Moneyball doesn't work." Moneyball is a book -- and now a movie -- not a strategy.

More McCourt hate? Click here and check out the picture. Notice the MLB produced a poster talking about a special promotion where all the teams are giving money to Stand Up To Cancer. Also note the asterisk and specific mention the Dodgers aren't giving to the charity. The Sons of Steve Garvey notes that the Dodgers are giving proceeds to their own cancer charity (ThinkCure) and this could just be another way of Selig's office to sleight McCourt's administration.

More Rays' financial woes: It's no secret the Rays have money troubles, despite a stellar on-field product for the past handful of seasons. Payroll was cut after last season and several guys who had previously been key pieces were either traded or walked via free agency. Still, things are tighter than ever. " ... we’ve clearly fallen short on our financial projections," principle owner Stuart Sternburg said (TampaBay.com). "We have to make some projections but I could not have projected our attendance would be down what it was. I don't think anybody would have thought that either. ... Nothing positive happened financially this year. We were last (in attendance going into the weekend). I hadn't even realized that. I didn't forecast last."

Berkman's leverage: Outfielder Lance Berkman has enjoyed a career renaissance with the Cardinals this season and reports have indicated he wants to stay put. In fact, several reports from the St. Louis area said the Cardinals didn't trade Berkman when he cleared waivers in the last week of August because they feared that would prevent them from retaining him. So it seemed like a pretty sure thing he'd stay put. Not so fast, tweets Joe Strauss of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Strauss says it might not be a sure thing and that Berkman has leverage. Remember also, the Cardinals' payroll is going to be tight if they retain free-agent-to-be Albert Pujols.

'Man in White' travels to Minnesota? One of my favorite storylines of the season has been mocking those who really believe Jose Bautista and the Blue Jays are aided by a rogue sign stealer in Toronto. So, of course, since that story broke I make it a point to pass along whenever the Jays either don't hit well at home or explode on the road. And check this one out, courtesy of The Hardball Times: Bautista has seven career home runs in 34 plate appearances in Minnesota's Target Field. Justin Morneau, Joe Mauer, Denard Span, Ben Revere, Nick Punto and Tsuyoshi Nishioka have combined for 1,683 plate appearances in the Twins' new home. And they've combined for six home runs. Amazing. At his pace in that number of plate appearances, Bautista would hit 347 home runs.

Rangers staying in house: Some rumors have indicated the Rangers might be in on the Albert Pujols or Prince Fielder sweepstakes, but instead the Rangers are reportedly going to stick with Mitch Moreland at first base (MLB.com). It makes at least some sense. They'd be better served shoring up pitching -- All-Star starting pitcher C.J. Wilson is a free agent, too -- than worrying about beefing up an already potent offense. Plus, Moreland is only 26, really cheap and under team control for a while. If he further develops his power stroke (16 home runs and 21 doubles this year), he'll end up being a bargain.

No safety helmets for Philly: Despite second baseman Chase Utley suffering a concussion from being hit in the helmet by a pitch, the Phillies players are still declining to use a new, safer helmet model (Philly.com).

For more baseball news, rumors and analysis, follow @EyeOnBaseball on Twitter or subscribe to the RSS feed.
  •  
Comments
hotmeuly
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 20, 2011 5:19 pm
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator



peulouy
Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 18, 2011 10:03 am
This comment has been removed.

Post Deleted by Administrator




Since: Dec 2, 2011
Posted on: December 8, 2011 12:19 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

I've met a little something fresh, new on a variety of sites each and every day. Truly endlessly refreshing to learn content articles among other sorts of people coupled with realize anything at all web site. Many thanks for adding.



Since: Dec 15, 2010
Posted on: September 14, 2011 10:16 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

He's against  wearing hats honoring 9/11 victims but not against performance-enhancing drugs? Time for Selig to go.



Since: Aug 18, 2010
Posted on: September 14, 2011 9:42 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Baseball is america's pass time and always will be. People like lsusmc are too young and too stupid to get it. Don't blame baseball because your attention span is that of a squash. Who said that they don't honor 9-11? Just you

Hey solid gold--If I am too young and stupid to get it, how old do I have to be?  I am well into my 50's and remember when baseball was America's pass time.  I am also not senile enough to think that it still is.  You also clearly cannot read or comprehend the obvious if you think I am the only one that is complaining here.  Did you just pick my post at random or are you really that moronic?  I am a retired Marine, so I think I get it.  You, not so much. 



Since: Feb 5, 2008
Posted on: September 14, 2011 9:18 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Hey superchess, can you read? This blog may have been mostly about the Mets 9/11 hats, but it also makes mention of 7 other topics, including the Rays. So before you jump down someone's throat, like you did with GoPokes, try to comprehend what you are reading.
Or did you only read what you wanted to?



Since: Apr 16, 2009
Posted on: September 14, 2011 9:08 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Since you don't live in NY, you can't begin to understand how special baseball was to NY after 9/11.  Your certainly entitled to your thoughts, but since you don't have any frame of reference, you really don't get it.  Why should Selig care if a meaningless game between the Mets and Nationals feature a tribute to the 9/11 hero civil servants?  He's all too happy to sell red white and blue hats for the other holidays that celebrate this country. 



Since: Apr 16, 2009
Posted on: September 14, 2011 9:04 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

After everything the city of NY has provided Joe Torre and his family, this is how he repays us??  He's just another shill for Selig who should be absolutely embarrassed for himself.  This is leadership?  I will never buy another MLB item or ticket until he is gone. 



Since: Mar 11, 2007
Posted on: September 14, 2011 8:52 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Selig should not be miffed.  He should be embarrassed because it was a bonehead decision.  He should also be embarrassed that he was miffed.



Since: Jan 16, 2010
Posted on: September 14, 2011 4:05 am
 

Pepper: More to the Mets' 9/11 hats story?

Hey, GoPokes.................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Nice post, and I mostly agree, BUT KEEP YOUR COMMENTS ON TOPIC!!!!!!

This story/article/blog/comment section is supposed to be about the Mets being forbidden to wear special hats to honor "First Responders" on the anniversary of the 9/11 attack.  It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the lack of fans at Tampa Bay games.
If you feel a driving need to vent about the non-supportive fans in Tampa..........or LACK of fans in Tampa.........then you should start your own blog or comment listing, and use that topic heading.


The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com