Blog Entry

Five teams to improve, five to decline in 2011

Posted on: March 29, 2011 5:56 pm
Edited on: March 29, 2011 9:35 pm
By Matt Snyder

Finally, spring training is concluding. Now we have a day or two before your favorite team begins play. In the meantime, I'm here to bring you the top five teams to decline and the top five to improve upon their 2010 performances. In return, you accuse me of bias and call me names. It's fun for everyone, really. One thing to keep in mind is that improving or declining by more than 10 games is pretty drastic. On some of these, I'm looking at something like a seven-game swing.


1. Boston Red Sox. Well, let's see ... Last season Kevin Youkilis only played 102 games, Dustin Pedroia saw action in 75 and Jacoby Ellsbury just 18. Josh Beckett was either injured or ineffective all season. Meanwhile the Red Sox added Carl Crawford and Adrian Gonzalez to a team that won 89 games, despite all those injury woes -- and some underachieving from people like John Lackey. Easiest call on the board here, and even Yankees fans would have to concede this team is loaded.

2. Oakland A's. The pitching staff is stellar, even including the bullpen. The starting rotation is already really good and only getting better. The A's won 81 with one of the worst offenses in baseball last season. A full season of Coco Crisp, Kurt Suzuki bouncing back and the additions of Hideki Matsui and Josh Willingham don't exactly sound like adding Gonzalez and Crawford, but small improvements will do wonders for the pitching staff. Slugger Chris Carter is waiting in the wings, too, and don't be surprised if Billy Beane adds a bat at the deadline.

3. Colorado Rockies. Troy Tulowitzki needs to stay healthy and Dexter Fowler needs to get closer to his ceiling. I'm going out on a limb that both happen, along with steps forward from Chris Iannetta and Ian Stewart. Watch Jhoulys Chacin's development in the starting rotation, too. He's got big potential.

4. Milwaukee Brewers. This is contingent upon the big names staying healthy and Zack Greinke getting healthy as soon as possible, because this team is paper-thin. But the top line is very impressive. Plus, the division is not very good at all. The Brewers are going to score runs, get good starting pitching (again, assuming the health thing) and have a good back-end of the bullpen. If they can overcome defense and depth deficiencies, they'll win the Central.

5. Florida Marlins. Call it a bit of a gut call, but I really like the Marlins. The rotation really has great potential with Javier Vazquez returning to a pitcher's park in the NL East (he's apparently too intimidated by being a Yankee) and Ricky Nolasco having the ability to be a true No. 2 if he can ever stay consistent. Anibal Sanchez and Chris Volstad have -- again, this word -- potential to be solid at the end, with stud Josh Johnson leading the five-some. I love the outfield potential of Logan Morrison, Chris Coghlan and Mike Stanton, so long as all three can stay healthy. Hanley Ramirez is primed to have a big season, too.


1. San Diego Padres. Removing Gonzalez from the middle of the batting order changes the complexion of everything. And Mat Latos is already hurt, which does nothing to alleviate the concern of the huge workload increase he's experienced over the past two seasons. Most of all, the Padres just seem outmanned by the Giants and Rockies. Winning close to 90 games seems outlandish. Of course, many people said that last year, too.

2. Houston Astros. They overachieved in a big way last season according to run differential (the 'Stros allowed 118 more runs than they scored) and aren't any better. Other than Hunter Pence, the position players are either getting old (Carlos Lee), still unproven (Brett Wallace) or just not that good (Jason Michaels, Bill Hall, Michael Bourn). I'm not a huge fan of the rotation, but it's going to have to carry the team. Good luck with that.

3. Tampa Bay Rays. This is difficult. It's hard to not love the Rays for being so good at sticking with the Yankees and Red Sox in the mighty AL East on that paltry payroll. The loss of Crawford hurts. Carlos Pena wasn't overly productive -- though he was much better than his batting average said -- last season, but his presence helps everyone else see better pitches. That goes away with Dan Johnson at first. The loss of Matt Garza isn't a big deal, so long as Jeremy Hellickson does his thing and James Shields returns to form. The bullpen is worse, though. Look, I'd pick the Rays to win the NL Central if they were in it, but the Yankees aren't any worse and the Red Sox are way better. The Orioles should be better as well. I think the Rays win in the ballpark of 86 games, but that's 10 worse than last year and good for third place.

4. Toronto Blue Jays. They're still building and are moving in the right direction, but winning 85 games again in that division is a very tall order. Any offensive bounce-back from the likes of Aaron Hill and Adam Lind is negated by Jose Bautista's return to this planet.

5. St. Louis Cardinals. If anyone can pull this off, it's Dave Duncan, but losing Adam Wainwright was a death blow. Chris Carpenter is old and injury-prone. Jaime Garcia is due a massive regression. Kyle Lohse was awful last year and Jake Westbrook doesn't have good stuff. Kyle McClellan could very well prove a solid No. 5 starter, but he hasn't exceeded 75 2/3 innings the past three seasons in the bullpen. Can he really double that and remain effective? The outfield defense won't do the staff any favors, either. The Pujols/Holliday/Rasmus combo -- and even Lance Berkman in a best-case scenario -- is very solid, but there's only going to be so much they can do on some nights. I feel like mid-to-high 70s in wins, but Duncan and Tony La Russa find ways to make people wrong often.

For more baseball news, rumors and analysis, follow @cbssportsmlb on Twitter or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Since: Dec 10, 2007
Posted on: March 31, 2011 8:27 am

Five teams to improve, five to decline in 2011

Who hires and approves these supposed analysts / sports experts' stories?  Though I know the AL East will be very competitive again this year, I cannot buy in their negativity to the Blue Jays.  I have been looking at their predictions and their stories and every one of them (other than one who predicted the Jays in third) will not give the Jays any bit of credit.  This bonehead here states "winning 85 games again in that division (AL East) is a very tall order".  To start off with, the Jays did not win 85 games in that division last year; in fact they only played 72 games in that division, the other 90 were in other divisions and the NL.  And overall, they hold their own when playing in the AL East.  Where they need to improve is in the inter-league play (wish MLB got rid of it) where every year the Jays do badly.

As for Bautista, though I don't think he will hit 54 homers again this year, I wish he did so that the moron who promised to set Oh Canada! in his Ipod to wake him up every morning would eat his words.  But I do think Bautista will hit 35+ and will near his RBI total of last year as the fewer HRs will be replaced by an increase in doubles; and if Lind returns to his promised potential, then it will offset Bautista's decline.  As for pitching, the Jays have a young starting rotation that will only continue to improve as they reach their potential.  The loss of Marcum is not the end of the world though we will miss him.  But Drabek will fill in nicely; after all Marcum only won 13 games, not 20 or more that you would believe the way some analysts speak of him now that he is on a US based team.

I can accept less coverage on the Blue Jays since they are in a foreign land; but I would like to think that when these idiots posing as knowledgeable sports analysts report on the Jays, they would give them a fair and less biased assessment.  I predict that the Jays will win between 85 and 90 games this year; and I do not think that the wild card will come from the AL East.  There are too many question marks around the Yankees pitching, too many losses of key players on the Rays, and the Orioles are just different players but similar make up (though I do like Markaikus).

Enough rant!

Since: Feb 1, 2011
Posted on: March 30, 2011 5:09 pm

Five teams to improve, five to decline in 2011

Utley injury worries are overblown.  He played 115 games last year and slugged nearly 100 points lower in 2010 than he did in several of the just prior years when he was truly studly.  While Utley was merely good but not great last year, the Phils went out and won the most games in MLB.  This year, they are tracking to have a full season of Oswalt as opposed to just a half season like last year.  This is in addition to landing Cliff Lee.  A healthy Utley for the backstretch of the season and the playoffs is icing on the cake, but when it is reasonable to expect 30 games started out of Halladay, Hamels, Lee, and Oswalt then the Phils merit consideration as one of most likely teams with a very real possibility to improve.  To say otherwise is just hating on the Phils because they are so good.  It's easy to be a naysayer amidst all the hype but nobody remembers haters with a mouthful of sour grapes.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or